Analysis and assessment of the risk of accidents of a structure as a system by the method of "Fault Tree Analysis" on the example of a nuclear power facility under seismic impact
Analysis and assessment of the risk of accidents of a structure as a system by the method of "Fault Tree Analysis" on the example of a nuclear power facility under seismic impact

Analysis and assessment of the risk of accidents of a structure as a system by the method of "Fault Tree Analysis" on the example of a nuclear power facility under seismic impact

DOI: 10.37153/2618-9283-2021-1-78-93

Authors:  

Зенченкова Диана Вениаминовна Zenchenkova Diana V.
Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Buildings, PGUPS. Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation


Rubric:     Seismic risk and damage   
Key words: risk, accident, failure, analysis method, "Fault Tree Analysis", probability, safety, seismic impact, building structures, structure, "wet" spent nuclear fuel storage
Annotation:
The article discusses a method for analyzing the risk assessment of failures of the structure as a system by developing a "Fault Tree Analysis". Formulas were proposed for the numerical estimation of the probability of system failure, taking into account the stochastic dependence of the failures of its elements. On the example of a nuclear power facility, a "wet" stand-alone storage facility for spent nuclear fuel, an analysis of possible scenarios of a facility failure was carried out, a "Fault Tree Analysis" was developed and calculated under seismic impact. It has been determined that the risk of structure as a
system under seismic impact is determined by the risk of falling process
equipment and building structures on the overlap of storage compartments or
stored nuclear fuel. To increase the safety of building structures under
seismic impact, it is necessary to pay special attention to the design features
of the frame part and the interface between the monolithic storage compartment
and the frame part, as the most vulnerable link. 
Used Books:

1. Augusti G., Baratta A., Kashiati F. Veroyatnostnye metody v stroitel'nom proektirovanii. M.: Stroiizdat, 1988. 584 p. (In Russian)

2. Bolotin V.V. Prognozirovanie resursa mashin i konstruktsii. M.: Mashinostroenie, 1984. 312 p. (In Russian)

3. Dzheffers Dzh. Vvedenie v sistemnyi analiz: Primenenie v ehkologii. M.: Mir, 1981. 252 p. (In Russian)

4. Dillon B., Singkh CH. Inzhenernye metody obespecheniia nadezhnosti sistem. M.: Mir,1984. 318 p. (In Russian)

 5. Sinitsin A.P. Raschet konstrukcii na osnove teorii riska. M.: Stroiizdat, 1985. 304 p. (In Russian)

6. Stefanishin D.V., Shul'man S.G. Problemy nadezhnosti gidrotekhnicheskikh sooruzhenii. S-Pb.: Izd. VNIIG im. B.E. Vedeneeva, 1991. 50 p. (In Russian)

7. Rainshke K., Ushakov I.A. Otsenka nadezhnosti sistem s ispol'zovaniem grafov. M.: Radio i svyaz', 1988. 208 p. (In Russian)

8. Stroitel'stvo v seismicheskikh raionakh: Aktualizirovannaya redaktsiya SNIP II-7-81* :

(SP 14.13330.2018). M.: Standartinform, 2018. 116 p. (In Russian)

9. Normy proektirovaniia seismostoikikh atomnykh stancii: (NP-031-01). M.: FBU NTC YARB, 2001. 49 p. (In Russian)

10. Elokhin A.N. Analiz i upravlenie riskom: teoriia i praktika. M.: PolIMEdia, 2002. 192 p. (In Russian)

11. Metodicheskie ukazaniia po provedeniiu analiza riska avarii gidrotekhnicheskikh sooruzhenii. 2-e izdanie. STP VNIIG 210.02.NT-04 / Pod red. E.N. Bellendira, N.Ya. Nikitinoi. SPb.: Izd. VNIIG im. B.E. Vedeneeva. 2005. 100 p. (In Russian)

12. Metodicheskie ukazaniia po provedeniiu analiza riska opasnykh proizvodstvennykh ob"ektov (RD 03-418-01). Seriia 03. Vypusk 10 / Koll. avt. M.: ZAO “Nauchno-tekhnicheskii tsentr issledovanii problem bezopasnosti», 2010. 40 p. (In Russian)

13. Memorandum to Members of ICOLD Committee on Dam Safety: Guidelines on Risk Assessment on Dams. 19.10.98.

14. Risk Assessment in Dam Safety Management. A Reconnaissance of Benefits, Methods and Current Applications/ Rev. No. 2. 5. ICOLD. 29.09.2003.

15. Vladimirov V.A., Malinetskii G.G., Makhutov N.A. i dr. Upravlenie riskom: Risk. Ustoichivoe razvitie. Sinergetika. M.: Nauka, 2000. 432 p.

16. Khenli Dzh. E., Kumamoto X. Nadezhnost' tekhnicheskikh sistem i otsenka riska. M.: Mashinostroenie. 1984. 528 p. (In Russian)

17. GOST 27.310-95. Nadezhnost' v tekhnike (SSNT). Analiz vidov, posledstvii i kritichnosti otkazov. Osnovnye polozheniya. M.: IPK Izdatel'stvo standartov. 1996. 20 p. (In Russian)

18. Guidelines for the Risk Analysis of Technological Systems. Committee Draft, IEC/TC 56. 27. 1, 1993-09-30.

19. Kudzis A.P. Otsenka nadezhnosti zhelezobetonnykh konstrukcii. Vil'nyus: Mokslas, 1985. 156 p. (In Russian)

20. Kuznetsov A.A. Nadezhnost' konstrukcii ballisticheskikh raket. M.: Mashinostroenie, 1978. 256 p. (In Russian)

21. Geniev G.A. Ob otsenke dinamicheskikh ehffektov v sterzhnevykh sistemakh iz khrupkikh materialov. Beton i zhelezobeton. 1993, no.3, pp. 25-27. (In Russian)

22. Raizer V.D. Teoriia nadezhnosti v stroitel'nom proektirovanii. M.: Izdatel'stvo ASV, 1998. 304 p. (In Russian)

23. Gradostroitel'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii, ot 29.12.2004 N 190-FZ (red. ot 30.12.2020) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 10.01.2021) (In Russian)

24. Federal'nye normy i pravila v oblasti ispol'zovaniia atomnoi energii. NP-061-05. Pravila bezopasnosti pri khranenii i transportirovanii iadernogo topliva na ob"ektakh ispol'zovaniia atomnoi energii. Moskva, 2005. (In Russian)

Возврат к списку