The state and prospects of production and application of reinforcement with a periodic profile
The state and prospects of production and application of reinforcement with a periodic profile

The state and prospects of production and application of reinforcement with a periodic profile

DOI: 10.37153/2618-9283-2024-3-46-69

Authors:  

Тихонов Игорь Николаевич Tihonov Igor N.
Dr. Sci. (Engineering), Head of the Center №21 of NIIZhB named after A.A. Gvozdev of JSC RCC. Moscow, Russian Federation

Звездов Андрей Иванович Zvezdov Andrei I.
Dr. Sci (Engineering), Professor, Deputy Director General for Scientific Work of JSC RCC. Moscow, Russian Federation

Тихонов Георгий Игоревич Tikhonov Georgy I.
Design Engineer of the Center №21 of NIIZhB n.a. A.A. Gvozdev of JSC RCC. Moscow, Russian Federation


Rubric:     Theoretical and experimental studies   
Key words: : stages of interaction, concrete, reinforcement, annular profile, double-row profile, six-row profile, four-row profile, multi-row profile, spacer, competitiveness, efficiency, seismic, emergency loading, exorbitant loads, pulling from concrete, adhesion, plastic deformation, hardening
Annotation:

Introduction. The article considers the influence of the design solution of the reinforcement of periodic profile on the strength and deformability of adhesion to concrete.

Aim. Description of design solutions for new types of multi-row profiles, the results of their research and prospects for mass application in construction.

Materials and methods. The effectiveness of reinforcement in reinforced concrete depends on the mechanical properties of the material of the rods, the adhesion and interaction of their surface with concrete at all stages of loading, characterized by the design of a periodic profile. The methodology and equipment of the Research Institute of Concrete and Reinforced Concrete named after A.A. Gvozdev were used to conduct the research.

Results. According to the results of foreign and domestic studies, it has been established that it is impossible to completely eliminate the existing disadvantages of the "ring" and double-row "crescent" profiles, due to the peculiarities of their design solutions, and improvement is futile.

Due to the preservation of adhesion strength with concrete in the extreme stage of deformation (after reaching the yield point), as a result of low spacer, new types of reinforcement provide increased construction safety, especially under extreme external influences (seismic, explosions, impacts, etc.).

The four-row profile of reinforcement, when synchronizing rolling rolls, forms a two-way screw thread on the surface of the rods and can successfully compete with foreign GEWI-Stahl screw rods.

Conclusions. Replacing rods with a two-row European crescent profile with rods with a four-row profile of domestic design will reduce the consumption of reinforcement in reinforced concrete structures by 10–25 %, ensure increased construction safety and save lives, especially in earthquake-prone areas of development, increase the competitiveness of Russian rebar products in foreign construction markets, and ensure substitution of foreign screw rods.

With an annual production of 10 million tons of rebar, only a 10 % reduction in its consumption in reinforced concrete will have an effect, due to saving metal, energy resources for its production, transport and technological costs, production of additional products, at least 100 billion rubles.

Used Books:

1. Bond of reinforcement in concrete. State-of-art report prepared bу Task Сrоuр Bond Models (fоrmеr СЕВ Task Сrоuр 2.5) CEB-FIP. August. 2000.

2. Mayer U. Zum Einfluss der Oberflachengestalt von Ripptnstahlen fuf das Trag – und Verformungsverhalten von Stahlbetonbauteilen, Dissertation, Universitat Stuttgart, Institut fur Werkstoffe im Bauwesen, IWB – Mitteilungen 2002/1.

3. Mulin N.M. Rod reinforcement of reinforced concrete structures.Moscow: Stroyizdat Publ., 1974, 2З3 p. [In Russian].

4. Madatyan S.A. Reinforcement of reinforced concrete structures. Moscow: Voentechlit, 2000, 256 p. [In Russian].

5. Tikhonov I.N., Meshkov V.Z., Rastorguev B.S. Design of reinforced concrete reinforcement. Moscow, 2015, 276 p. [In Russian].

6. State Standard 5781-82. Hot-rolled steel for reinforcement of ferroconcrete structures. Specifications. [In Russian].

7. Mulin N.M., Konevsky V.P., Sudakov G.N. New profile types for reinforcement rods. Effective types of reinforcement for reinforced concrete structures: Collection of scientific works No. 1. Moscow: Research Institute of Concrete and Reinforced Concrete named after A.A. Gvozdev, 1970, pp. 16–45. [In Russian].

8. State Standard 5.1459-72. Hot-rolled steel of periodic profile for reinforcement of reinforced concrete structures. Requirements for the quality of certified products. [In Russian].

9. SNiP 2.03.01-84*. Concrete and reinforced concrete structures. [n Russian].

10. Skorobogatov S.M. Fundamentals of the theory of calculating the endurance of rod reinforcement of reinforced concrete structures. Moscow: Stroyizdat Publ., 1976, 108 p. [In Russian].

11. Tikhonov I.N., Kopylov I.V. Efficiency of production and application of rebar rolled products with new types of periodic profile. Stroitel’nye Materialy = Construction Materials. 2021, no. 12, pp. 35–47. [In Russian].

12. IST AFM 7-93. Rolling reinforcement of a periodic profile. Technical conditions. [In Russian].

13. ISO 6935-2. Steel for the reinforcement of concrete – Part 2: Ribbed bars.

14. State Standerd R 52544-2006. Weldable deformed reinforcing rolled products of A500C and B500C classes for reinforcement of concrete constructions. Specifications. Moscow: Standartinform Publ., 2006. [In Russian].

15. State Standerd 34028-2016. Reinforcing rolled products for reinforced concrete constructions. Specifications. [In Russian].

16. SP 63.13330.2018. Concrete and reinforced concrete structures. General provisions.

17. Tikhonov I.N. On the causes of catastrophic destruction of reinforced concrete structures under seismic impacts. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo = Housing Construction. 2023, no. 5, pp. 13–21. (In Russian).

18. Kochulu A., Kochulu D.A. Causes of the earthquake in Turkey and the consequences of the colossal destructive impact. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo = Housing Construction. 2023, no. 5, pp. 4–12. [In Russian].

19. Savrasov I.P. Strength, crack resistance and deformability of bent reinforced concrete elements reinforced with A500 steel with various periodic profiles: dis. ... Cand. Sci. (Eng.): 05.23.01. Moscow: Research Institute of Concrete and Reinforced Concrete named after A.A. Gvozdev, 2010, 207 p. [In Russian].

20. Tikhonov I.N., Zvezdov A.I., Meshkov V.Z., Ignatova N.V., Tikhonov G.I. Reinforcement bar of periodic profile. Patent for the invention RU 2680153 C2. Published on 18.02.2019, bulletin No. 5.

21. Semchenkov A.S., Zalesov A.S., Meshkov V.Z., Kvasnikov A.A. The nature of adhesion of rod reinforcement of various profiles to concrete. Beton i Zhelezobeton = Concrete and Reinforced Concrete. 2007, no. 5, pp. 2–7. [In Russian].

22. Kvasnikov A.A. Joint work of fittings of various periodic profiles with concrete: dis. ... Cand. Sci. (Eng.): 05.23.01. Moscow, 2012, 202 p. [In Russian].

23. SP 14.13330.2018. Seismic building design code. Updated version of SNiP II-7-81*. [In Russian].

24. IST 36554501-065-2020*. The use of reinforcement of classes A500SP, Au500sp and A600SP in reinforced concrete structures. [In Russian].

25. Tsyba O.O. Crack resistance and deformability of stretched reinforced concrete and non-stressed rod reinforcement having a different relative area of crushing of transverse ribs: dis... Cand. Sci. (Eng.): 05.23.01. Moscow: Research Institute of Concrete and Reinforced Concrete named after A.A. Gvozdev, 2012, 203 p. [In Russian].

Возврат к списку