Nonlinear seismic response of reinforced concrete large-panel precast building of type '92s'

DOI: 10.37153/2618-9283-2025-2-09-30

Authors:  
Rubric:     Theoretical and experimental studies   
Key words: Large-Panel Buildings, Joint, Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis, Seismic Performance Evaluation, Interstory Drift Ratio
Annotation:

Introduction. This study investigates the seismic performance of reinforced concrete precast Large Panel Buildings (LPBs) of type 92s (USSR). The widespread use of LPBs in seismically active regions, along with their unique structural properties and the limitations of current analysis methods, necessitates a more comprehensive understanding of their behavior during seismic events.

Methods. A numerical model was developed using LIRA-SAPR software to capture the complex dynamics of LPBs. This model incorporates nonlinear material properties, panel-to-panel interaction, and joint behavior under dynamic loading conditions.

Results. The analysis revealed significant differences in seismic response, particularly for lower concrete grades, highlighting the critical role of accurate material characterization. The distributions of displacement, acceleration, and damage align with existing literature and full-scale testing results. Notably, nonlinear dynamic analyses demonstrated substantial discrepancies compared to traditional code-based linear analyses, especially in predicting damage distribution and interstory drift ratios (IDR). The nonlinear analysis indicated a concentration of damage in lower stories, with maximum IDR values of 0.282% in the first story for high-intensity scenarios, contrasting with code-based predictions of 0.178% in middle stories.

Discussion. Despite the strengths of the LIRA-SAPR software, certain limitations were identified, such as the inability to modify the standard hysteresis model, which reduces the accuracy of simulating strength and stiffness degradation. The findings suggest a need for revising existing building codes to incorporate specific acceptance criteria and updated analysis procedures tailored to the unique behaviors of LPBs.

Used Books:

1. Rozanov N.P. Large-panel construction. Moscow: Stroyizdat, 1982, 224 p. [In Russian]

2. Malaia K. A Unit of Homemaking: The Prefabricated Panel and Domestic Architecture in the Late Soviet Union. Architectural Histories. 2020, vol. 8, no. 1, 12 p. DOI 10.5334/ah.453

3. Makhviladze L. S. Seismic-resistant Large-panel construction. Moscow: Stroyizdat, 1987, 221 p. [In Russian]

4. Zhunusov T.Zh., Ashimbaev M.U., Buchatskiy E.G., Zhusupbekov B. Vibration Tests of a Five-Story Experimental Large-panel Residential Building of 69 series. Proceedings of KazNIIISS. Studies on the Seismic Resistance of Structures and Constructions. Almaty, Kazakhstan, 1977, pp 56–69. [In Russian]

5. Shokbarov E.M., Omarov Zh.A., Lopukhov S.A., Shaimerdenov T.A. Vibrodynamic tests of nine-storey large-panel residential building in the city of Shymkent. Earthquake engineering. Constructions safety. 2023, vol. 5, pp. 10–23. DOI 10.37153/2618-9283-2023-5-10-23 [In Russian]

6. Lapin V.A., Aldakhov E.S., Aldakhov S.D., Ali A.B. Probabilistic estimation of reliability values for frame buildings based on the results of certification taking into account tectonic faults. Earthquake engineering. Constructions safety. 2021, no. 2, pp. 54–71. DOI 10.37153/2618-9283-2021-2-54-71 [In Russian]

7. Fintel M. Performance of Buildings with Shear Walls in Earthquakes of the Last Thirty Year. PCI Journal. 1995, vol. 40, pp. 62–80. DOI 10.15554/pcij.05011995.62.80

8. Velkov M. Behaviour of large panel building during the Romania earthquake of March 4, 1977. 1978, pp. 32–42. DOI 10.5169/SEALS-24183

9. Freddi F., Novelli V., Gentile R., Veliu E., Andreev S., Andonov A., Greco F., Zhuleku E. Observations from the 26th November 2019 Albania earthquake: the earthquake engineering field investigation team (EEFIT) mission. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 2021, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 2013–2044. DOI 10.1007/s10518-021-01062-8

10. Kianoush M.R., Elmorsi M., Scanlon A. Response of Large Panel Precast Wall Systems: Analysis and Design. PCI Journal. 1996, vol. 41, no. 6. pp. 90–108. DOI 10.15554/pcij.11011996.90.108

11. Oliva M., Gavrilovic P., Clough R. W. Seismic testing of large panel precast walls: Comparison of pseudostatic and shaking table tests. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 1990, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 859–875. DOI 10.1002/eqe.4290190607

12. Becker J.M., Llorente C., Mueller P. Seismic response of precast concrete walls. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 1980, vol. 8, no. 6. pp. 545–564. DOI 10.1002/eqe.4290080605

13. Pekau O.A. Structural integrity of precast panel shear walls. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 1982, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 13–24. DOI 10.1139/l82-002

14. Yu S., Zhang Y., Bie J., Zhang W., Jiang J., Chen H., Chen X. Finite Element Analysis of Hysteretic Behavior of Superposed Shear Walls Based on OpenSEES. Buildings. 2023, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1382: 1–18. DOI 10.3390/buildings13061382

15. Abaev Z.K., Schildkamp M., Valiev A.D. Base Shear Seismic Demand Comparison for Rubble Stone Masonry Building in Nepal, Russia and Tajikistan. Earthquake engineering. Constructions safety. 2022, no. 6, pp. 18–45. DOI 10.37153/2618-9283-2022-6-18-45. [In Russian]

16. Abaev Z.K., Dendup T. Seismic performance evaluation of different design options of typical reinforced concrete residential building by nonlinear static and dynamic analyses. Building and Reconstruction. 2024, no. 5 (115), pp. 4–22. DOI 10.33979/2073-7416-2024-115-5-4-22 [In Russian]

17. Abaev Z.K. Nonlinear seismic response of reinforced concrete frame buildings. Structural Mechanics and Analysis of Constructions. 2024, no. 6 (317), pp. 55–63. DOI 10.37538/0039-2383.2024.6.55.63 [In Russian]

18. Wardach M. Assessment of the degradation state of joints in large-panel buildings. Engineering Failure Analysis. 2022, vol. 145, pp. 107020: 1–14. DOI 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.107020

19. Clough R. W., Malhas F., Oliva M.G. Seismic Behavior of Large Panel Precast Concrete Walls: Analysis and Experiment. PCI Journal. 1989. Vol. 34. Seismic Behavior of Large Panel Precast Concrete Walls. № 5. pp. 42–66. DOI 10.15554/pcij.09011989.42.66

20. Ashkinadze, G. N., Sokolov, M. E., Martynova, L. D. (1988). Reinforced Concrete Walls of Seismic Resistant Buildings. M.: Stroyizdat. 504 p. [In Russian]

21. Vodopianov R. Y. Simulation and Computation of Large-panel Buildings in PC LIRA-SAPR 2017. Housing Construction. 2017. No. 3, pp. 42–48. [In Russian]

22. Shapiro G. I., Shapiro A. G. Calculation of the Strength of Platform Joints in Panel Buildings. Industrial and Civil Engineering. 2017. No. 3. pp. 42–48. [In Russian]

23. Chopra A. K. Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering: Prentice-Hall international series in civil engineering and engineering mechanics. Dynamics of structures. Fifth edition. Hoboken, N. J: Pearson, 2017. 960 p.

24. Yu X., Li X., Bai Y. Evaluating maximum inter-story drift ratios of building structures using time-varying models and Bayesian filters. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2022. Vol. 162. pp. 107496. DOI 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107496

25. Barnshtein M. F., Borodachev N. M., Blumina L. Kh. Dynamic Design of Structures for Special Loads, M.: Stroiizdat. 1981. 215 p. [In Russian]

26. Koff G.L. (Ed.), Baulin Yu.I., Smirnov V.I. Lessons of Spitak. Vladivostok, Dal’nauka Publ. 2008. 156 p. [In Russian]

27. Jafari A., Ghasemi M. R., Akbarzadeh Bengar H., Hassani B. Seismic performance and damage incurred by monolithic concrete self-centering rocking walls under the effect of axial stress ratio. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 2018. Vol. 16. No. 2. pp. 831–858. DOI 10.1007/s10518-017-0227-2