The Analysis of a Structure Subjected to Seismic Action, Taking into Account the Change in the Structure's Design in the Vibration Process
The Analysis of a Structure Subjected to Seismic Action, Taking into Account the Change in the Structure's Design in the Vibration Process

The Analysis of a Structure Subjected to Seismic Action, Taking into Account the Change in the Structure's Design in the Vibration Process

DOI: 10.37153/2618-9283-2020-3-19-30

Authors:  

Чернов Ю.Т. Chernov Yu.T.
Doctor of Technical Science, Professor. Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU) National Research University, Moscow, Russian Federation

Кбейли Джаафар Qbaily Jaafar
Postgraduate, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU) National Research University. Moscow, Russian Federation


Rubric:     Theoretical and experimental studies   
Key words: the normal form method, seismic impact, analytical research, elements failure
Annotation:
A calculation method for structures under seismic impacts is proposed taking into account changes in buildings' structural design during deformation, based on the normal forms
method and the presentation of design forms for calculating seismic forces in the form of expansions in the forms of natural vibrations. These formulas are close to the calculated ones given in a number of standard documents. The solution is made in time steps. At each step, the structural design is adopted from the results of the static calculation for seismic forces determined at the previous stage. The solution method is getting built in the form of forms expansions using the software MATHCAD. The seismic forces numerical values are
calculated at each time step, taking into account changes in the structural design in the previous step by static calculation for seismic forces impacts. The proposed approach allows us to evaluate the seismic forces values, taking into account changes in the structural design during oscillations at each time step. A change in the structural design is evaluated by static calculation based on seismic forces determined in the previous step. The coefficient K1 values were estimated as the ratio of seismic forces at the stage preceding
failure to seismic forces at the stage corresponding to the end of the elastic stage.
Used Books:

1. Anil K. Chopra. Dynamics of Structures Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. 4th Edition. California: Prentice Hall, 2012, 980 p.

2. Riddell R., Delallera J. Seismic Analysis and Design: Current Practice and Future Trends. Chile: Santiago, Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering 11WCEE. 1996, pp. 5-8.

3. Chernov Y. T. Vibrations of Structural Building. 2-d edition. Moscow, Publishing АВС. 2011. 384 p.[In Russian]

4. Hyo Seon Park, Byung Kwan Oh. Damage Detection of Building Structures Under Ambient Excitation through the Analysis of the Relationship between the Modal Participation Ratio and Story Stiffness. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 31 March 2018, vol. 418, pp. 122-143.

5. Montoya-Coronado L. A., Bairán J. M., A Direct Performance Based Seismic Design Method for Irregular Structures. Chile: Santiago, 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering 16WCEE. 2017, pp. 1-2.

6. Haoran Pana, Koichi Kusunokia, Yuki Hattorib. Capacity-Curve-Based Damage Evaluation Approach for Reinforced Concrete Buildings Using Seismic Response Data. Engineering Structures. 15 October 2019, vol. 197, pp. 122-143.

7. S.A. Diaz, L.G. Pujades, A.H. Barbat, Y.F. Vargas, D.A. Hidalgo-Leiva, Energy Damage Index Based on Capacity and Response Spectra. Engineering Structures. 2017, vol.152, pp. 424-436.

8. Luisa Bertoa, Marco Bovo, Irene Rocca, Anna Saetta, Marco Savoia, Seismic Safety of Valuable Non-Structural Elements in RC Buildings: Floor Response Spectrum Approaches. Engineering Structures. 2020, vol. 205, pp. 21.

Возврат к списку