Reducing the dynamic impact of a landslide on buildings and transport structures in the village of Toktogul, Uzgen district of the Kyrgyz Republic
Reducing the dynamic impact of a landslide on buildings and transport structures in the village of Toktogul, Uzgen district of the Kyrgyz Republic

Reducing the dynamic impact of a landslide on buildings and transport structures in the village of Toktogul, Uzgen district of the Kyrgyz Republic

DOI: 10.37153/2618-9283-2024-1-31-48

Authors:  

Apsemetov M.Ch.

Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Professor of the “Highways, bridges and tunnels” Department, Kyrgyz State Technical University named after I.  Razzakov. Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republiс


Altynbek E. Aidaraliev
associate professor,
the Department «Highways, bridges and tunnels» Kyrgyz State University of Construction, Transport and Architecture (KSUCTA) named after N. Isanov

Ulanbek T. Shekerbekov

Cand. Sci. (Eng.), associate professor of the Department “Highways, bridges and tunnels” Department, Kyrgyz State Technical University named after I. Razzakov. Bishkek, Republiс of Kyrgyzstan   

shekerbekov_@ut@mail.ru


Kurmanbek uulu Nurlan
Cand. Sci. (Eng.), associate professor of the “Highways, bridges and tunnels” Department of Kyrgyz State University of Construction, Transport and Architecture named after N. Isanov. Bishkek, Republic of Kyrgyzstan 


Rubric:     Seismic safety and seismic isolation of buildings   
Key words: : landslide, risk reduction, reduction of dynamic impact, friction coefficient, slope stability, soil moisture, excavation, gravity, balance of forces, projection of forces
Annotation:
In the Kyrgyz Republic, there is a significant increase in landslide activity against the backdrop of ongoing climate change, especially in the southern mountainous regions of the country. The volume of soil during a landslide in this region can reach tens and hundreds of thousands of cubic meters, and in some cases more. The rate of landslide displacement ranges from several meters per year to several meters per second. The purpose of this study is to unload the landslide area to protect the population, roads and other structures of the village of Toktogul, Uzgen district of the Kyrgyz Republic. This landslide area was studied on the basis of field research on the ground and the results of desk work. The sliding of soil masses in the area can cause destruction and debris of residential and administrative buildings, roads and power lines, as well as injury and death. Considering the equilibrium of the system of forces acting on the subsidence soil mass of the slope section and analyzing them, measures for unloading the landslide body in this section are proposed. The proposed longitudinal profiles of drainage channels to reduce the moisture content of subsidence soil and transverse profiles of developed soil to reduce the weight of subsidence soil are presented. Based on the results of processing research data and analysis, it is recommended to reduce the weight of unstable (subsidence) soil by stepwise development along the slope of the site and transporting it up to 5 km for subsequent brick production. It is also recommended to protect subsidence soil from waterlogging by installing drainage channels. Based on the results of the research, a real project was developed to protect the site from landslides near the village of Toktogul. The proposed measures make it possible to reduce the risk of a landslide in the area under consideration using methods and technical means that are inexpensive and accessible to government agencies and local administrations.
Used Books:

1. MES KR (2021). Monitoring and Forecasting of Disasters on territory of the Kyrgyz Republic. Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan: Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Kyrgyz Republic.

2. Torgoev I.А. (2013). System monitoring landslides in Kyrgyzstan. Civil Security Technology, Vol. 10, 2013, no. 4 (38), 68–71.

3. Torgoev I., Alioshin Y.G., Torgoev A. (2013). Monitoring landslides in Kyrgyzstan. FOG – Freiberg Online Geoscience (pp. 130–139). Freiberg, Germany: TU Bergakademie Freiberg.

4. Vasilyev S.M., Akopyan A.V. (2016). Landslides and their manifestation on Rostov region territory. Izvestia NV AUK, 1 (41), 177–184.

5. Intrieri E., Carlà T., Gigli G. (2019). Forecasting the time of failure of landslides at slope-scale: A literature review. Earth-science reviews, 193, 333–349. DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.03.019.

6. Guzzetti F., Peruccacci S., Rossi M., Clark C.P. The rainfall intensity-duration control of shallow landslides and debris flows: an update. Landslides, 5, 3–17. DOI:10.1007/s10346-007-0112-1.

7. Lehmann P., Or D. (2012). Hydromechanical triggering of landslides: from progressive local failures to mass release. Water Resources Research, 48 (2): W03535.

8. Villarraga C., Ruiz D., Vaunat J., Casini F. (2014). Modelling landslides induced by rainfall: a coupled approach. Procedia Earth Planet Sci (pp. 222–228), 9. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeps.2014.06.025.

9. Lee R.W.H., Law R.H.C., Lo D.O.K. (2018). Importance of surface drainage management to slope performance, HKIE Transactions, 25:3, 182–191, DOI: 10.1080/1023697X.2018.1499449.

10. Choi K.Y., Cheung R.W.M. (2013). Landslide disaster prevention and mitigation through works in Hong Kong. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 5, 354–365. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2013.07.007.

11. Soils. Classification (2020). HOST 25100-2020 from January 1, 2021. Moscow: Standartinform.

12. Abdrakhmatov K.E., Djanuzakov K.D., Frolova A.G., Pogrebnoi V.N. (2011). Seismic zonation map of Kyrgyzstan. 1:1000000, 2011, IS NAC KR.

13. Seismic Resistant Construction. Design Standards (2018). SNiP KR 20-02:2018. Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan: State Institute of Seismic Resistant Construction and Engineering Design.

14. Engineering surveys for various types of construction (1998). SNiP KR 11-01-98. Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan: Kyrgyz Head Institute of Geotechnical Investigations.

15. Bezuglova E.V. (2005). Landslide hazard and soil displacement risk on the slopes (Dissertation of Candidate of Technical Sciences). Krasnodar, RF: Kuban State University.

16. Shadunz K. Sh. (2008). Analysis of a landslide process based on risk theory. Science Journal of Volgograd State University.10 (29), 7–10.

17. Klyuev R.V., Bosikov I.I., Egorova E.V., Gavrina O. A. (2020). Assessment of mining-geological and mining technical conditions of the Severny pit with the use of mathematical models. Sustainable Development of Mountain Territories, 3, 418–427. DOI: 10.21177/1998-4502-2020-12-3-418-427.

18. Automobile roads of general use. Drainage road trays. Technical requirements (2016). HOST 32955-2014 from June 1, 2016. Moscow: Standartinform.

19. Voronchikhina Е.А. (2010). Reclamation of disturbed landscapes: theory, technologies, regional aspects. Monography. Perm, RF: Perm State University.

20. Smetanin V.I. (2003). Reclamation and improvement of disturbed lands. Moscow, RF: Koloss. 89 c.

21. Gracheva R., Urushadze T. (2011). Landslides in a rural mountainous region: damaging and resourceforming impacts (South Caucasus, Georgia). Geography, environment, sustainability, 4. DOI:10.15356/2071-9388_01v04_2011_06.

22. Chuman T. (2015). Restoration Practices Used on Post Mining Sites and Industrial Deposits in the Czech Republic with an Example of Natural Restoration of Granodiorite Quarries and Spoil Heaps. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 8. DOI:10.1515/jlecol-2015-0007.

 

Возврат к списку